22 Comments to “Dualities of things”

  1. verns

    Mar 7th, 2007

    uhhmmm…ying yang!

    There must be a balance…I do believe in that.

    Before, I worry too much about money (or the lack of it) but time taught me that hindi talaga nauubos ang pera. Tama na kung may nawawala, nare-replenish sha.

    This is very good Dimaks. Hayyy I’m having blogger’s block.

  2. dimaks

    Mar 7th, 2007

    verns,
    Ahh circle of life :) ..I agree on that replenishment thing. Sometimes you just worry too much in times your pockets are empty, but sooner or later relief will come. But I think, only to those who deserves and works for it.

  3. rhodora

    Mar 7th, 2007

    Balance.. that is the answer. Not too happy, not too sad. Not too full, not too empty. Not too brave, not too coward… Ganun lang siguro.. :)

  4. dimaks

    Mar 7th, 2007

    rhodora,
    Wow, very nice way to put it. I agree on that.

  5. cai

    Mar 7th, 2007

    aristotle also said that. even a lot of social scientists like morris, levi-strauss, and others (there are plenty of them).. and duality is not opposites but compliments.. one can never exist without the other.. :D

  6. sexy mom

    Mar 8th, 2007

    ako, blind faith lang talaga. imagine, raising 7 kids! hindi ko na iniisip pa ang dualities of things. and it has worked–the Lord is good!

  7. dimaks

    Mar 8th, 2007

    cai,
    I agree. The wisdom behind the yin yang clearly speaks about the complimentary existence of things in the context of duality. But considering man being the 3rd subject, putting together the dual things, say for example health and sickness – man will be facing them as opposing poles since, rationally who would want to be sick and healthy at the same time? :)

  8. dimaks

    Mar 8th, 2007

    sexy mom,
    I gladly take that from you with all the glory of your wisdom behind it. Truly God is good.

  9. Alex

    Mar 8th, 2007

    wow, dualities. so jungian. it’s really amazing how nature juxtaposes two things. and it’s always two – yin/yang, life/death, bonnie/clyde… why not three? three stooges, tito/vic/joey…

    maybe it’s nature’s way of telling us that you need not count way past 2 to know what to expect. the higher power’s way of telling us Keep It Simple, Stupid.

    Hehe. Incoherent na ako. Peace out, dimaks! :D

  10. dimaks

    Mar 8th, 2007

    Ang aga mo Alex! Welcome to Ctrl+Alt+Delete! I was just browsing over your blog site at around 6am here in Japan and when I came back to my site, I found that new comment from you.

    I am bound or perhaps more inclined to adhere to simplicity. Mankind played a big blame on making things complicated :)

  11. annamanila

    Mar 8th, 2007

    Ang bigla kong naisip na duality eh puto kutsinta, tapa at itlog, mangga at suman. Binary pairs. Siguro dahil alas 6 na di pa ako nagbreak. Gutom na.

    Light and dark for example is just the ends of same spectrum. And the obvious about them is they complement each other. How can you enjoy light when you don’t know dark? How can u enjoy rest when you don’t know tiresome work. Ay, bloggers can be philosophers too, ha.

  12. kathy

    Mar 8th, 2007

    This reminds me of something written in Eccelesiastes…”all is vanity and chasing after the wind…” :)

  13. tina

    Mar 8th, 2007

    sometimes people need to to experience these things in order to appreciate soem things in life….

    one should understand death in order to understand life..

    there is enough good for everyone…. and everyone must realise that.. because life is meant to be abundant….

    but sometimes we all have to experience the opposite to appreciate the good. :P hehe

  14. dimaks

    Mar 9th, 2007

    annamanila,
    Wow, you had those culinary side of the interpretation :) how about kape at pandesal? :) What I can dig from your remarks is that, those things in our lives that usually come in pairs, in compliments or in opposition are to bring us to the realization of things deeper and more meaningful than a shallow mind can realize. Am I right?

  15. dimaks

    Mar 9th, 2007

    kathy,
    I wonder if you happened to read Barbara Frischmuth’s “Chasing after the Wind”? In panorama, she talks about breaking out of the dead-end situations. Just in case you might want to consider :)

    Mind sharing your ideas of how “vanity and chasing after the winds” connects with the duality of things? tia :)

  16. dimaks

    Mar 9th, 2007

    tina,
    I agree, people needs some spanking along the way :) ..and just like the appreciation of the importance of health, getting sick makes it more meaningful. Though if we can only control the phenomena of occurrence of things, who would want to be sick anyway.

  17. angelblush

    Mar 9th, 2007

    we can.. we can control all of it. everything that happens are due to the choices we make..

    if we keep making the choices that dont work… the “phenomena of occurence of things”… will always be against us…

    pero we can control everything.. just by knowing who we are.. and stand for it.. :P hehe

  18. dimaks

    Mar 9th, 2007

    angelblush,
    hey tina’s sister :D I am bound to think that there is another side to that of “everything that happens are due to the choices we make” -that is, every set of causes has its own set of effects. So occurrences do not occur because we made that choice that points to it, but because its just the rational thing to occur. Of course we choose and intend to be healthy at all times but we still get sick. Sometimes we wish for a sunny day but rain poured instead.

    Yay, are we on the same lane? lol

  19. Richmond

    Mar 9th, 2007

    ikinategorized ko yung blog sa paborito ko..

    http://monmon.wordpress.com/linked-by-an-angel/

  20. dimaks

    Mar 9th, 2007

    Richmond,
    Naks! maraming salamat :)

  21. annamanila

    Mar 11th, 2007

    Dimaks. Ganun na nga. What we see superficially as differences are really a unity. Like male-female. All of us have male-female principles … ultimately we’re all androgynous. Isama na din natin ang young-old., okay? Like you, you may be younger than me physically but you maybe an older soul. Di ba Tito Dimaks? Haha. (I think I also said this to Prab. Oooh, i am tending to repeat myself … bad sign!)

  22. dimaks

    Mar 11th, 2007

    annamanila,
    Older soul? hehe.. o sya, maybe lang naman e.




CommentLuv Enabled


Earn from Sponsored Tweets

  • Archives

    Meta